The decision taken by 10 Auckland, New Zealand, principals
to stop playing against a school that has been aggressively recruiting established
1st team rugby players, as reported in the New Zealand Herald
has caused a bit of a flutter.
It’s not an original story, of course, and the movement of high
performing players from schools that already have established rugby programmes
to others has become quite common in our schools rugby. I’ve stated my view –
it shouldn’t happen and it has to stop.
A respected headmaster of a Joburg boys school, apparently, recently
pointed out to a conference of his peers that they have the power to end the practice,
and it’s quite simple – stop playing schools who indulge in those practices. If
the heads agree to that (and they already have in terms of the charters and
agreements they have signed – not to mention by virtue of their
non-negotionable duty to be educational in all they do), then there wouldn’t be
a problem.
But there is, and at the end of the day we have to accept
that either some headmasters are dishonest, or they have lost control of what’s
happening in their recruitment departments.
An Auckland-style shunning of those who break the rules
would work, although it will punish the players at the banned school who had nothing
to do with it. No, we have to get everyone to stop doing it – simple as that.
I made the mistake of taking to Twitter to defend my stand
on the matter and came up against all the usual excuses and justifications.
No-one is saying that providing better opportunities to kids
who have potential is a bad thing. On the contrary, the success stories of
those who have had their lives turned around through bursaries should be sung
from the hilltops. I do some work at two Joburg schools who have foundations
doing just that and have come across magnificent examples aplenty.
But that’s not what we are talking about, although those who
condone the practice of elite recruitment often try to disguise it as some sort
of altruistic opportunity creation. Yeah right! They are after more wins for
the first team at the end of the year, nothing else, and they should try and
pull the wool over other people’s eyes.
As someone in that Twitter thread I’ve spoken of pointed
out, there are cases where players who are already on bursaries at good rugby
schools are lured to others. There is only one way to do that: offer a better
financial deal. That’s buying, not bursary granting.
I’ll give you two examples, and let’s stop stuffing around
and name some names. There was an under-14 player, a black boy on a full
bursary, living in a top class hostel at a school that produces multiple provincial
players who didn’t come back after playing in the Glenwood under-14 Festival at
the beginning of the year.
Then there was the Golden Lions Craven Week player, also on
a bursary, who suddenly upped and left for Paarl Boys’ High – he didn’t move
out of financial need or the desire to be at a school where he would be recognised
– he already had been.
There are examples aplenty of that sort of thing and not a single
one can be justified. And please stop telling us that the parents approached
you. The only cases where that happens are when they have already committed to commoditising
their sons and are looking for a deal (as is pointed out in the NZ Herald
article) and I’ve been told of a number of examples where that has happened
here too.
Our top rugby schools have excellent coaches and the players
work incredibly hard, I’ve seen that up close and first hand. Of course you
deserve success if you are prepared to do that, and you can’t expect success if
you don’t. But if we are to be ethical and educational – and that’s not an
optional extra, school sport has to be just that - then we should work hard at developing the
children who are placed in our care.
We certainly can’t go shopping about for replacements and reinforcements
to ensure our place on the top of the pile. If you do that you have no right to
crow, and those who try to justify what you do in terms of transformation,
rugby excellence and professional career pathways are as unethical and uneducational
as you are.
And everyone should agree to never play against you again.