Thursday, 10 May 2018

Recruitment - let the principals swear to it


There’s a statement you sometimes hear that goes along the lines of “don’t bring me problems, bring me solutions”. It’s been rejected by the business leadership gurus. I found that out when I Googled the term, hoping to find out who it was that said it first (Teddy Roosevelt is given the credit, though that’s not certain).

It’s been discredited, I read, because it discourages people from pointing out what’s wrong, unless they themselves know how to fix it. And, in any event, isn’t the boss being paid the big bucks because it’s his job to find solutions?
Of course, some problems don’t appear to have solutions. None that are easily apparent, anyhow.
I say all of this because I don’t accept that we should stop complaining about the sorry state of school rugby in this country because we can’t come up with ways to set things straight. Now I’m a whiner, not a solution provider – Teddy Roosevelt's actual quote was “complaining about a problem without proposing a solution is called whining” – but even I have a suggestion on how recruitment, in particular, can be reined in.
The easy solution, of course, is to say: stop doing that! That would be the ethical, educational, socially responsible thing to do, but things have spun so far out of control that we all know that’s not a viable suggestion anymore.
I received a surprisingly big response to my recent retelling of the stories of the shocking experiences of two young players who were recruited on rugby bursaries.
I got an e-mail from someone in New Zealand who sent me the links to documents used by College Sport Auckland to regulate the movements of players between schools in their area.
Take a look at them.
The gist of it is that when a player involved in what they call a premier sport moves from one school to another, the principal of the school he was at has the option to accept that it is a bona fide move, with nothing untoward about it, or he can ask the principal of the school the player is going to (the receiving school), the student and the student’s parents to fill in declaration forms.
Those forms must confirm that no pressure was put on the player or his family, no third party was involved in any way and that there was no incentive to move in the form of a bursary payment etc
Now we all know that in the SA situation sometimes the receiving principal will insist that none of the above happened. The boy just turned up at the school, they’ll tell us, and said he wants to be there. Or his parents moved from Cape Town last week and bought a house around the corner from the school.
What’s significant is that the Auckland declarations must be signed by a Justice of the Peace – they are sworn affidavits, in effect, and there’s a warning that a false declaration will be referred to the police and could lead to the expulsion of the school from competitions.
There’s a proposed solution right there. Get the principal to swear under oath that there was no luring of a player, and to take personal responsibility for any lies that are told. That would slow things down, I’d wager.
I guess that these regulations were introduced in Auckland because they were faced at some time with a similar situation to what we are facing now. The difference, of course, is that there appears to be a regulating body controlling school sport there. We don’t have that. School sport is under the control of the principal of the school here and we have to trust him or her to be honest.
And of course we must assume that our principals are honest and honourable. But are they all? If the stories we hear are true you have to wonder if, at best, the principals of the schools involved are simply not in the loop or at, at worst, whether they are complicit in some pretty shady practices.

Giving a multi-code organising body some sort of over-riding authority, or allowing the provincial of national federations to intervene won’t work here, in my opinion, because school sport is education, first and foremost.

So, don’t ask me how it’s going to work. I’m a whiner, not a solutions provider, after all.


No comments:

Post a Comment