Sunday 19 March 2023

Stop the game when the winning margin gets out of hand

 

My needle’s sticking again, I’m afraid.

I saw the scores from the Potchefstroom Gimnasium vs Paarl Gimnasium rugby games on Saturday and I can’t help myself.

There were five results published. The average scoreline is 75-3; Paarl won the first team game 83-3, and the U16As 97-3. The comments on Facebook were the expected mixture of those who (like me) who believe that a fixture like that is an abomination, and those who see nothing wrong with it, or even believe it’s a good thing.

 My view is that anything that happens at a school has to be educationally accountable, and there’s nothing educational about allowing scores in rugby matches to reach those numbers. Education is about learning things that help children grow and develop into good adults, and that’s a much about building character, kindness and humility as it is about building strength, acquiring skills and accumulating knowledge.

 Allowing a team of children to be humiliated, discouraged and possibly injured, during a rugby game, while at the same time allowing the other team to bully them, to gloat and to assume an air of superiority, is not educationally accountable, and that applies to both teams.

 Apart from all the other damage that’s being done, it’s bad for the future of the game. The good thing about being a writer who is a stuck needle on a record, is that you can go digging on your computer and find what you wrote before. I sounded off on this topic in 2017, 2018, and again last year. Here’s what I wrote in 2018 after seeing scores similar to those in Potchefstroom on Saturday:

 

 You’ll remember that last year a team that won 221-0 posed in front of those numbers on the scoreboard and the photo was posted on the school’s Twitter and Facebook sites. I commented at the time that it was as sickening as those pictures that you see of so-called hunters posing over the carcasses of slain lions or elephants that had been chained to stakes. I have the same nausea again today, and it’s an appropriate comparison, because rugby players who are willing to turn out for the lower teams in the junior age groups are rapidly becoming an endangered species and we should be doing all we can to conserve them, just like we should be looking after those magnificent wild animals.

 

One of the comments on the Gimmies scores post referred to the fact that the Potch teams had travelled 1000 km to play a rugby game, so they should be allowed to do so for the full match time. Well, you have to ask how the fixture ever happened. Apart from the fact that the two schools adhere to the custom, coming from our Dutch colonial past, of calling high schools gymnasiums, I wonder if they have much in common, and those responsible for arranging that 1000-km trip surely knew beforehand what the results were going to be.

 Rugby, in this instance, is a vehicle for a range of lessons taught and learnt. Going on a rugby tour is about a lot more than the hour-long match against the opposing school. The paperwork and arrangements required when a team goes on tour is a mammoth task, made ever more difficult by the red tape that the education department requires. If so much trouble is being gone to, and if the parents are paying the sorts of tour fees that they are, then it had better be about more than just the hour-long matches played.           .

 No, its also about travelling across the country in a bus, with your team mates, and all the socialisation and sprit building that happens on that bus. It’s about being hosted by a family in the town you are going to and having to interact with your opponent the night before the game, and at breakfast in the morning; it’s about seeing and experiencing a school that is different to yours; it’s about your manners, and showing gratitude towards those have offered you hospitality and thanking the teachers who went with you and made it all happen.

 And it is about the game you will be playing there, but not only it. So, if the game has to get called early because it’s a mismatch and not in anyone’s educational interests that runs its course, then so be it. That act itself can be a lesson, to both teams. It doesn’t make it all a waste of time and money, all the other important lessons are still being taught.

 Rugby games between children should be called off when the score starts climbing rapidly and the opponents are unable to stop that from happening, every time.   

5 comments:

  1. I totally agree with you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I’ve always thought that when a school team leads by 40 that the game should be called. This is a huge margin. Not the winning or losing team will gain anything by continuing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Completely agree Theo.
    When the game stops being a sprouting competition, then it should be stopped. At school level we have to safeguard that it always remains, where possible, an equal physical contest as well. Otherwise we run the risk of serious injuries.

    ReplyDelete
  4. πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»

    ReplyDelete