Call me troubled, but I miss the opportunity to crack wise, now that
Independent Newspapers has decided that I am surplus to their requirements and
that my two supplements - the Star Workplace and the Saturday Star School Sport
- do not form part of their future plans.
My two cents worth on that: the owners are perfectly right when they say
there is no point in going on as an exclusively print media company, in the
face of dwindling circulation and diminishing advertising revenues.
So, Independent is to become a multi-media publisher. Great idea, but
there's no indication of how that is going to happen and, when it does, how
it's going to help things. Everything I've read indicates that even the most
famous newspapers around the world are still scratching their heads when it
comes to monetising their online offerings.
And, since the media will always be about content, you still need a
newsroom to produce that. Your competitive edge in the crowded online news
market will be the quality of your content (as it is in every commercial
endeavour), so how will getting rid of your best and most experienced
journalists help your cause?
Sure, us grey-heads aren't that tech-savvy - although we can learn, I've
started a blog, for goodness sake! But to replace the oldies with kids who are
good with their thumbs and know how to simultaneously put the same Apple Iphone
pictures on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram doesn't really make business sense.
They might be able to record an event on their phones and have a clip
posted on Youtube while I'm still busy scribbling down notes and trying to
focus my old trustworthy Canon, but no-one has been able to explain to me you
make money out of posting things on all those apps.
I would have thought you need both: old-fashioned hacks like me who can
sniff out the real story that's always there, and render it in readable
English, and the tech-savvy kids who can promote the newspaper, generating
circulation and advertising sales.
And that's not just me talking. A couple of centuries, collectively, of
experience and knowledge walked out of Independent last Wednesday, including
some of the best, award-winning, writers in the profession. Everyone I spoke to
agreed with what I say.
But there was nothing voluntary about it. In my case my supplements
simply did not appear on the new organogram, and when it came to applying for a
new job (as everyone was required to do) my only option was to try for a
"multi-media content provider" position four rungs down on the
Patterson grading scale, advertised at half the salary I was earning.
That's the equivalent of firing me, no question, and most of the others
who opted for VSPs were in the same boat.
So, it's a fresh start for me. I haven't given up on the idea of still
producing a school sport supplement in print. Part of its value, I think, lies
in scrap books. Everyone keeps clippings of their appearances in print, or
those of their children, and you can't do that with online publications.
Websites have other advantages of course - they have a longer
shelf-life; there aren't the same space limitations; reports can be updated;
and it's cheaper to advertise there. So, a group of us are working on an online
school newspaper which can cover sport, but also those other, equally important
areas of school life like academics, cultural activities, community service
etc. Watch this space!
In the week since my independence from Independent some have been kind
enough to express disbelief and disapproval at the ending of what I used to do.
I'm hoping the few who read this musing will pass it along to others who may
feel that way.
If not, well at least I've had my two cents worth, and as, I now
realise, one who is addicted to having my say put out for others to read, I
feel a lot better.
Back soon.
nice post thank for sharing this.
ReplyDeleteT20 World Cup 2020 Time Table
T20 World Cup 2020 Time Table PDF