Another
rugby season’s just about done, and just in time if you ask me.
I’ve taken
an interest in the Virseker Cup playoff games up here n Gauteng for a change – I work for a rugby
website now and I have to report on something – and I’m also keeping my eye on
the big games that seem to be stacked up at the end of the season. It was the
Paarl Derby a few weeks ago, Jeppe vs KES and Glenwood vs Grey the week before
that and this weekend is the really big one, Grey College vs Paul Roos
Gimnasium for the heavyweight crown of SA Schools rugby.
All of
those were preceded, of course by the Craven Week. And at the Craven Week,
roughly half of the players on display were black and in many of the games the
best players on the field were black, and when in the discussions around who
stood out were held the names of players of colour were right up there: Gumede,
Manyike, Xamlashe, Vlitoor, Ncube – all among the stars of the show, just as in any other year.
As the
season wound down however, the teams still in action began to take on a rather
bleached look. Sure, the names mentioned above are in the SA Schools team,
not playing for their schools, but you have to wonder where the other great
black players who were in Paarl have disappeared to. Selborne, KES, Glenwood
and Jeppe are exceptions, but in the games I’ve been to in the last three weeks,
and the ones I’ve watched on TV, there have been 1 or 2 players of colour, tops,
on the field and some of the teams have had none at all.
Now you
have to wonder what the justification is for showing, on national TV, a rugby
game between two all-white teams in 2018! Worse, you have to ask why the top
rugby schools in the land seem to see transformation as not their responsibility,
and why they are being allowed to get away with it.
I’m not
talking in absolutes here. Of course the top-ranked schools have produced some
fabulous players of colour over the years, well they have fielded them, anyway.
And that may just be the point – the practice of bringing in black stars, usually
from somewhere else, is not transformation. It meets the demands of the
compulsory quota and I’ll concede that playing for a top school in their final year
or two, against other top schools, plays an important part in turning them into
the finished product, but it’s actually about winning games, not about
developing human potential.
And if, as
seems to be the case at the moment, there are no black stars about that can
help them do that, then it seems they are quite happy to go shopping at the
white market and field all-white teams.
And the
English speaking boys schools are carrying the can. They don’t have enough good
old-fashioned Afrikaner meat in their ranks, so they don’t rank right up there
consistently, but they are doing fine with teams that are 50%, or more, black.
And the provincial teams that those players are being selected for are doing OK
at the Craven Week.
The
professional teams, and the Springboks, are going to have to field more players
of colour, it’s just not useful to argue about that anymore. The way things are
going, it doesn’t look like those players are going to be coming from our rugby
powerhouse schools, and no-one is doing anything about it. Is that not perhaps why
we aren’t competitive at international level anymore?
Ha ha. I made a similar comment when I watched my son play against Affies last year. I was told language is a barrier. I think it boils down to racism really. The need to preserve Afrikanerdom (culture and religiosity and netwerke). Two of the aforementioned "English" schools must be credited for what they have done to actively ensure black players are front and centre. Not that they are perfect in comparison on all fronts. But one would think that Afrikaans schools would make more of an effort. Maybe a black kid would not want to go to one of those schools. I think quotas in school teams will have to become mandatory but then can that be enforced when the language medium and the existing racial balance is intimdatory?
ReplyDelete