I said I wasn’t going to make the trek to Krugersdorp to
watch the Craven Week this year, but I lied. It was the thought of sitting in
the traffic for an hour each way that turned me off, but the FOMO got me in the
end, and I drove out there on Tuesday.
I’m not sorry I did. I wanted to see for myself if what I, and
others who, like me, have been around like me for while, suspected – the
Lions selectors have stuffed it up again – and after watching them go down to the
Bulls, I’m afraid it loooks like they have.
But mainly, I guess, I wanted to say that I was there in
2024. I didn’t go to the 1994 Craven Week in Newcastle, for some reason, but I
was at the 2004 week in Nelspruit, and in Middelburg in 2014, and I was in
Secunda in 1993 – so there’s three decades of attendance right there.
The first time I attended the week was actually in 1985,
before I became a newspaper reporter. It was in Witbank, close enough for a hotheaded
young coach to drive to, and there were a couple of my players from Highlands
North Boys’ High in the, then, two Transvaal sides. So, the coach of one
of the other English schools that had a representation and I, went there on all
three days.
Then, in 1988, I was made the manager of the Transvaal XV
that played in Port Elizabeth, and in 1989 I was the coach of the Transvaal A
team that won the main game at Ellis Park – it was the Centenary of the Transvaal,
now Lions, Union. The coaching appointments in those days were a bit of an emeritus
position, rotated between members of the High Schools Committee.
It was in 1989 that I first got a job as a freelancer at The
Star, and it was a reporter that I attended the 1990 week in Durban. I missed
out in just three years after that, including 1994 in Newcastle, but I was at
every other Craven Week until my last as a reporter in Paarl in 2018. Add in
this year, and that makes 31 in all. I don’t know if that’s a proud or a
pathetic record, but I’m pretty sure it’s unique, certainly there is no-one
still going to the events who has been around as long as I have.
So, you can see why I decided to go to Monument on Tuesday
after all. The Craven Week is, of course no longer anything like it was through
most of those years. When it was started by Piet Malan in 1964, endorsed by Dr
Craven, it was a celebration of schoolboy rugby. Craven absolutely insisted the
emphasis was on playing open, attractive rugby and that winning wasn’t the primary
aim.
The “main” game was awarded to the two teams that played the
“best” rugby. It wasn’t a “final” and I remember Dr Craven chewing out the SAPA
reporter in the press box one year because the Citizen used that word in the
headline to his article.
The advent of full TV coverage, of sponsors who call the
tune and the “professionalisation” of the game changed all of that. It’s become
a knockout tournament for the most successful unions now. Round one is
quarterfinals, the four winners meet in round two and the last two standing play
in the final on Saturday. And it’s officially called a final in the SA Rugby correspondence,
and the winners are referred to as the champions.
All the fixtures for the final day used to be allocated on that
basis of the best rugby played. Nowadays, it seems, they have become classification
games ala knockout tournaments, and Boland, for example, who played great rugby
by all accounts and won both their earlier games are relegated to the B field,
simply because from the get-go they were never given an opportunity to play one
of the big guns. Dr Craven would never have allowed it.
The best players from the schools in the Boland region are,
of course, playing for Western Province, who have two teams at the Craven Week,
and third at the U18 Academy Week – but that’s a different balls-up that no-one
has the balls to address, I’m afraid
Back to those Lions selections. It’s a rugby truism that if
your second team is highly competitive with your first (even to the point of besting
them in training games) then you don’t have a very good second team, you’ve got
a big selection problem!
That’s happened with the Lions for two years in a row. The
Academy Week team is cleaning up in its competition again this year - they (pictured above) won the main game 45-25 against EP today - while the Craven
Week team (with some exceptions obviously) again looks quite ordinary.
There are players in the B team who should have been in the A team.
Simple as that!
I agree with a great deal you have said here Theo. The selection is always open to a level of subjectivity. The difference in my humble opinion between the academy team and craven team lies in the coaching. Just my humble opinion.
ReplyDelete